An EU Commission Expert Evaluator plays a crucial role in the assessment of proposals submitted for funding under various European Union programs. Their responsibilities include:

• Evaluating Proposals: They review and assess proposals based on the criteria set by the EU Commission. This involves a thorough examination of the proposal's relevance to the program's objectives, the feasibility of the proposed activities, the potential impact, and the quality of the work plan.

• Providing Recommendations: Based on their evaluation, they provide recommendations on whether a proposal should be funded. They may also suggest improvements or modifications to the proposal.

• Ensuring Transparency and Fairness: They ensure that the evaluation process is transparent, fair, and impartial. They must avoid any conflicts of interest and maintain confidentiality throughout the process.

• Reporting: They prepare detailed evaluation reports outlining their findings and recommendations. These reports are used by the EU Commission to make final funding decisions.

• Participating in Consensus Meetings: They may also participate in consensus meetings with other evaluators to discuss and agree on the evaluation of proposals.

In essence, an EU Commission Expert Evaluator plays a pivotal role in ensuring that the EU funds are allocated to the most deserving and impactful projects.

A National Expert Evaluator plays a crucial role in assessing and evaluating projects, programs, or policies within their field of expertise. Their responsibilities typically include:

• Assessment and Evaluation: They evaluate proposals, projects, or programs based on predefined criteria. This could involve assessing the feasibility, sustainability, and potential impact of a project or program.

• Technical Expertise: As experts in their field, they provide technical insights and recommendations. They might be asked to evaluate complex information and make informed judgments.

• Reporting: They prepare detailed reports outlining their findings and recommendations. These reports can influence decision-making processes at the national level.

• Advisory Role: They often serve in an advisory capacity, providing guidance based on their evaluations. This can influence policy decisions, strategic planning, and program development.

• Quality Assurance: They ensure that projects or programs adhere to national and international standards. They might also be involved in monitoring and evaluation to ensure ongoing compliance.

• Capacity Building: They may also contribute to capacity building by sharing their knowledge and expertise, training staff, and helping to improve systems and processes.

• Elsevier Computer and Security

• IEEE Access 

• International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT)

•  International Conference On Cyber Conflict (CyCon)